Statement of the scientific community about extraterrestrial mummies
From scientific argumentation and attitude, to the confession of faith, who are the representatives of the science of the 21st century? Do your own opinion!
Let’s take up point by point the “arguments” defended by these officials of the Peruvian Ministry of Culture.
« Members of the national and international scientific community, experts in the study and conservation of human remains (mummies and skeletons) »
Arguments of own authority to influence the public and to insinuate that the specialists who conducted the medical tests would be less competent or not at all.
Scientists mobilized by the Inkari Cusco Institute have Doctoral degrees awarded by Universities on four continents.
Examples include Physicians, Forensic Anthropologists, Archeology Professors, Medical Professors, Medical Imaging Specialists, Physics Teachers, Surgeons of several specialties, Bone Specialists, Genetic Analysis Specialists, Biochemistry Professors, Doctor in Neuroscience, etc.μ The members of the scientific community behind the declaration tried to compare them with them in order to attack their credibility.
Despite this subtle aggression, the scientists mobilized by the Inkari Cusco Institute chose to respond by using the language of science.
They have published their analyzes and have agreed to respond to the media on all matters relating to science and their clinical examinations of the biological materials in question.
The arguments have been developed orally and in writing with photos, examinations and all that can include a rational scientific demonstration.
« a campaign of irresponsible disinformation. »
No clinical examination of bodies or organs
No analysis, no evidence
No scientific arguments
Scientists and Doctors conducted clinical examinations, consulted the CT-scans, X-rays and all data before making any report and declaring the authenticity of the bodies. Here are several of their works shared internationally in three languages.
All statements are accompanied by physical evidence from CAT-scans, X-rays and clinical examinations. Their reports are available on the Internet and are formulated in the language of science, that of each specialist.
« … These discoveries correspond without doubt to pre-Columbian human remains – the cultural heritage of the nation – deliberately manipulated and even mutilated… »
Lack of clinical examination and consultation of test results and medical reports.
Medical Doctors and other specialists who have carried out clinical examinations have made medical reports and find that the bodies are:
- divided into two species,
- free of incisions.
One (Reptile humanoid) is described for the first time in history of biological sciences, with reptilian characteristics but a humanoid aspect.
We take note that :
- Hands and feet with three fingers are not deformities listed in congenital diseases.
- The skeletons of the hands and feet are correlated anthropometrically.
- The macrocephalic skulls show no trace of artificial mechanical pressure, aimed at producing this elongation.
- The neck is retractable.
- The body does not have mammary glands.
- It has a gonochoric sex (male and female), the female and the male have a transverse cloacal opening between the legs.
- Its reproduction is oviparous.
A description of these beings states that:
This species measures about 58.5 cm. in adult stage, has an a macrocephalic head that is elongated backwards, with an ovoid shape, the forehead is wide and the back is tipped, complemented by three ridges in the upper part of the head, without hair, without a nasal septum and without ear.
This is the first time that a species with the characteristic of presenting a square foramen magnum is described.
The location of the foramen magnum is on the middle floor of the skull and not on the back floor as in Homo sapiens or gorilla.
It presents differences in its anatomical structure (it does not have radius, ulna or carpal bones), which by evolutionary homology does not share a common ancestor with the species on earth.
Its hands by analogy are anatomically similar to that of the extinct dinosaur Velociraptor. In pronation position with long and large fingers terminated by nails. – In the “separate” tridactyl hands about 35 cm long with 22 cm fingers, the nail occupies 90% of the distal phalanx. It is long and thick. Let us recall that in Homo Sapiens, the nail occupies only 50% of the distal phalanx.
Moreover, the X-rays of some tridactyl hands show that each finger has 6 phalanges, so 18 in all!
The hypothesis of an artificial assembly of such a hand would require the use of the phalanx of one and a half hand to build a tridactyl hand! That is to say not less than three additional hands per pair of tridactyl hands. The process then becomes very complicated, for it imposes both the use of the bones of different hands, of different persons, while at the same time leading to the whole of the characters presented simultaneously by the tridactyl organs, such as:
- the anthropometric correlation of each bone of the phalanx,
- their anatomical symmetry, their phenotypic correlation,
- their functional abilities,
- and all this without mentioning the absence of trace of surgical intervention, (neither incision, nor tear nor scar)
Reproduction: gonochoric species (female and male),
female oviparous lays a number of 3 eggs at a time, the embryo begins its development after its oviposition, both have a cloacal crack between the legs.
Sexual dimorphism: the male presents slightly long limbs
and the trunk slightly shorter than the female and the central part of the clavicle is protruding in the male.
Locomotion: Plantigrade biped, with three long toes at each foot finished by nails.
The other species (Jamin Palpanensis) is a specimen of 1m70 heigh. The distal phalanx of the feet serve as a point of support for the large toes, they are adapted in an evolutionary way and are positioned at right angles to 90 ° downwards. (Tamper-proof). They serve as support and damping to the long fingers for the biped walking process, thus avoiding the tapping of the fingers on the ground, they have grooves and / or horizontal fingerprints. (unforgeable). An evolutionary modification of the distal phalanx of the foot was observed, as well as the presence of round pads with parallel and horizontal grooves and / or fingerprints.
In the hands of the mummy María one finds the following types of articulations:
- Phalangeal carpal joint
- Proximal interphalangeal joint and
- Distal interphalangeal joint.
There is no metarcapanic carpal joint, due to the absence of metacarpal bones, so there is no palm of the hand.
The hand consists of a total of 15 phalanges. And 12 points of articulation in the fingers, as well as hominid type nails that cover almost entirely the distal phalanx. The length of each finger is 17 cm.
The possibility that this corresponds to manipulation in the past or in the present has been completely eliminated because of the absence of scientific evidence such as cuts, sutures, tears and / or any other manipulation process that could confirm that it has occurred.
The dating of the fingers of hands and feet coincides with the rest of the body of the mummy Maria, so that the anatomical structures characteristic of this specimen correspond to 100%, its authenticity has thus been confirmed.
It has a number of about 26 vertebrae for the vertebral column, in the human being this number is 32.
On the other hand, the datings realized demonstrate that these beings existed and lived long time before the appearance of pre-Columbian civilizations and met with them much later.
Many non-human anatomical features have been listed. The absence of traces of surgical procedures is noted.
The absence of congenital organs deformed in this way is shown in the International Classification of Diseases published by the World Health Organization (WHO).
The distinction of two different species of the human species. The descriptive and comparative approach with the human species is well scientific.
« We hope that the same authorities will seek to ensure the proper protection and study of these remains and their places of origin in order to stop looting and trafficking of human remains. We also expect exemplary sanctions for those responsible for this predation of the heritage that belongs to all Peruvians and all humanity. »
Moral opinion and based on legality.
Preconceived ideas about the nature of the materials are not supported by evidence or argument.
Total lack of scientific demonstration..
The Inkari Cusco Institute informed the Peruvian Ministry of Culture and then the Presidency of the Republic formally.
The proofs of these letters were presented to the general public as well as to Peruvian justice.
In France, the Inkari Cusco Institute has informed the President of the Republic and the proofs of this communiqué will be used if necessary.
It should be remembered that without the intervention of the Inkari Cusco Institute, all the materials would have disappeared in private collections and would have left the national territory of Peru. Since January 2017, the Inkari Cusco Institute has been calling for the relevance of governments and UNESCO.
Today, petitions to governments have been inspired by the work of the Inkari Cusco Institute..
In spite of the inertia of the public authorities, the Incari Cusco Institute insists on mobilizing UNESCO to control these discoveries and carry out adequate scientific research.
« Finally, these illegal and criminal manipulations of human remains violate human dignity. »
Moral opinion and based on legality.
Negationism as to the results of clinical analyzes. No scientific arguments.
At what point do they speak for science?
After a clinical examination, Doctors declared the mummies don’t belong to the human species.
Physicians have taken samples for genetic analysis and dating. This is part of the basic scientific process to measure its nature, dating and authenticity.
All actions related to analyzes have expanded scientific knowledge.
They are consistent with the procedures carried out by science on all continents.
« In particular, the exploitation of pre-Columbian mummies by these people is an aggression and an offense against the Andean Culture, making it appear that its achievements are linked to a so-called “external aid”. »
Prejudices – Negationism before the results of analyzes.
The term “external aid” is imprecise. Should we understand extraterrestrial?
Presently, the analyzes carried out in Mexico and Russia confirm that the genes are nonhuman in nature. The results can be obtained from the following sponsors: Tercer Milenio TV and Gaia TV. On the other hand, certain datings forbid linking these beings to pre-Columbian civilizations since official history refutes the possibility of civilizations during these periods.
Finally, the descriptions following the examinations carried out by the specialists of the Inkari Cusco Institute make it possible to declare that one of these species does not belong to the family of hominids, to the order of primates, or even to that of mammals. Its characteristics are those of humanoid reptiles.
Due to the fact that there is no differentiation of the bones like the radius and ulna in the forearm and the tibia and the fibula in the leg (which has only one bone for each limb extremity) and the absence of carpal bones, evolutionary homology does not correspond to any common ancestor of any species on this planet, although it still has a certain anatomical analogy with the dinosaur legs that have disappeared, so that its biological origin is unknown to current science.
The results of analyzes and arguments are presented in the language of science.
Dating does not allow for a correspondence between known pre-Columbian civilizations and biological organs.
The description of a new species without homological correlation with other species and having no ancestors common to a terrestrial species.
« We offer our best services to work with the authorities to demonstrate our claims to the relevant authorities. We also propose to participate in activities that help to defend and promote the importance of our cultural heritage, the heritage of our ancestors. »
Autopromotion while revealing that their opinions remain to be demonstrated.
All the affirmations of the specialists are accompanied by medical evidence, radios, scanners. Demonstrations are filmed and photographed and shared internationally. All of these demonstrations can be downloaded. Here are a few.
The specialists continue their analyzes and try to formulate their reports in a simplified and pedagogical way, accessible to non-scientists.
« Sonia Guillén O’negglio (DNI 04649168), Guido Lombardi Almonacín (DNI 06959233), Elsa Tomasto-Cagigao (DNI 07258405), María del Carmen Vega Dulanto (DNI 10308912), Mellisa Lund Valle (DNI 07763061), Patricia Maita (DNI 25835019), Martha Palma (DNI 10537749), Carlos Herz Sáenz (DNI 07913390), Alejandra Valverde Barbosa (DNI 48813194), Marcela Urizar Vergara (CI 11347428-9), Claudia Aranda (DNI 20056087), Leandro Luna (DNI 23511760), Paula Concepción Miranda (DNI 29497158), Alejandro Vazquez Reyna (DNI 30651135) »
Names of scientists who make media statements on this case, while none of them have made a clinical analysis of biological materials and bodies. None of them consulted the reports of the specialists who carried out the analyzes in order to obtain fundamental information on the understanding of the nature and origin of the bodies.
Edson Salazar Vivanco – Surgeon,
Raymundo Salas Alfaro – Radiologist doctor,
Ramiro Hermoza Rosell – Surgeon,
Julio Espejo Torres – Bone specialist,
Renan Ramírez Vargas – Surgeon,
David Hermosa Gongora – Radiologist doctor,
Jésus Zalce Benitez – Forensic Pathologist, Forensic Anthropologist,
Jose De La Cruz Rios – Doctor in biology,
Konstantin Korotkov – Professor of Physics,
Michael Asseev – Genetic analysis,
Natalia Zaloznaja – Imaging and medical analysis,
Mary Jesse – Professeur – Medical imaging,
Thierry Jamin – Historian and Geographer
The name of a part of the scientists who have spoken after conducting clinical analyzes of bodies and biological materials and who have attempted to pass on the knowledge.
Comparison by Michel Ribardière.
With my thanks to Dr. Jose De La Cruz Rios, Dr. Jesus Zalce Benitez and the scientists who contributed to the writing of this synthesis.
With my thanks for the translation to Mr. Antoine BRUNO.